@王铁生 老爷子，您帮忙看看

这个说法靠谱吗？

以上符合NIFTP始作俑者的观点。

以上见于NIFTP始作俑者的原始论文。

@王铁生 谢谢您

但并不为WHO新版讨论稿所接受。

以上见于WHO新版讨论稿

@魏建华 请再看看WHO新版讨论稿中关于NIFTP组织病理学的描述：“Simple papillary infoldings or abortive papillary structures may be seen, but true papillae with fibrovascular cores are not found.”。

其实，最早提出挑战的是Juan Rosai大师，他在发表于2008年的一篇文章中就明确提出：

This being the case, why call them cancer and subject the patient to the overtreatment and mental anguish that such a diagnosis may elicit? As Julian Huxley wisely stated in a lecture given at Sloan-Kettering Institute in the 1950s, “Cancer (malignancy) must be defined operatively in terms of what the tumour cells do, not what they look like; otherwise the term ceases to have biological meaning.”............Juan Rosai..........